HI Wang,
It seems that this is authorization problem. As dummy give the same org. you have check the records.
Regards
Nishant Bansal
↧
Re: SRM Issue No documents correspond to search criteria
↧
Records managment in SRM not pointing to ECC records management
Hello All,
All Records Managment Integration settings are done, but when RM is called from SRM using portal under Related links, the RM within SRM is being called instead of RM within ECC.
Under Define Integration Scenarion, RM is pointed to ECC RM using RFC call through Logical system created.
RMS_ID is created under ECC RM using SRMREGEDIT.
The issue is that the RM within SRM is displayed instead of RM within ECC. Is there any config to be done to point to ECC RM from SRM under related links when a SC, RFx and PO is created and saved.
Thanks
Anita
↧
↧
Re: Can't modify a SRM PO
HI Fernando
Please can you check the post below
If you need to stop the automatic sourcing you need to set up a report similar to BBP_GET_status 2 It says as below :
"The simpliest way is just to copy BBP_GET_STATUS_2 into Z-Report, make neccessary corrections and plan Z-Report as a job instead of standard Report."
let me know your views
↧
Re: SRM Issue No documents correspond to search criteria
Hello Wang,
As per standard GR cannot be performed by user for below reasons.
1) GR already performed for full quantity and No Further Confirmations selected.
2) PO is having some errors in SRM system pertaining to posting date
3) Other users without super user role.
I hope as per checking the discussion above, first 2 points are addressed.
I am with the 3rd point , whether you are having super user role or not to perform confirmation.
If PO creator is not able to perform confirmation , then it is an issue.
I am thinking this would be an authorization issue. please check in that view.
Thank
Gupta
↧
Re: Disable Confirmation and Invoice Functionality in SUS
Hi Venkatesh,
This can be done thru changing BSP programs.
Senthil
↧
↧
Re: SRM Issue No documents correspond to search criteria
Hi
Please check the note: 1797489
Regards!
↧
SC forwarding issue
Hello,
We are using old version of SRM.
When SC is forwarded to another user for approval. SWIA does reflect forwarding user, but the same is not reflected in ITS.
The forwarded user gets a short dump (BBPSC07) and SC gets stuck. Could not figure out the reals reason even when using ITS debugger.
Any suggestion / help is appreciated.
Thanks / Bhavesh
↧
Re: PO's Tracking tab does not have entry of invoice
Hi Venu,
Is the Invoice visible through BBP_PD TCODE and check the Reference document for that.
Regards,
Nishant
↧
Re: To forward workitem without sending email notifications
Hello Abhishek,
use RECIPIENT_GET method from BBP_OFFLINE_APP_BADI BAdI implementation in order to filter out users you do not want to be able to use offline approval.
Regards.
Laurent.
↧
↧
Re: SRM Issue No documents correspond to search criteria
Hello,
if all suggestions given by forumers do not work, debug BBP_PD_PO_GETLIST function module.
Regards.
Laurent.
↧
Tables containing T-code BPH information
Hello,
Can someone please tell me the table which contains the hirechary tree, the hirechary node, and the BPs assigned to the hirechary node - This is done via t-code BPH...
Thanks
↧
Re: Tables containing T-code BPH information
Hello James,
have a look at BUT_HIER_* tables.
Regards.
Laurent.
↧
Re: SRM 7.0 workflow - Approval of Shopping cart item with multiple cost centre
Hi Ravi,
Responsibility resolver BADI is working fine, not dropping any approvers here. Infact SC preview is showing the approvers properly, till I order the SC. After Ordering, it is while assigning workitem to each decision set, it is dropping one. Not sure where this filtering logic is happeing in std. code.
↧
↧
Re: Replicate the vendors from R/3 to SRM (Through:-BBPGETVD)
Hi,
You should refer following links:
http://scn.sap.com/thread/1517155
https://scn.sap.com/thread/1820194
I hope it helps.
Regards,
↧
Change task description
Hi,
I've change description of task TS40007985. But when email is send this how it appeasrs. I don't kniw how to get rid of text in BOLD or to trace how it is added. And again i've included spacing but in outlook there is no spacing between lines.
"Document 1200010597 approved
Good Day,
Your SRM 7 document 1200010597 of type Shopping Cart was approved.
Please log onto the SRM functionality if you want to view the document.
http://prdport0.sars.gov.za:8100/irj/portal
Regards,
Procurement Department
***Please
note that this is a system generated message, please do not reply to this mail ***
The following messages have been triggered by the system:
You can view the document directly. Choose the
following link: Login"
↧
Re: PI and RFC connection not working at the same time
Hi Konstantin,
I checked in my system
CL_BBP_BS_ADAPTER_PO_CRT_ERP10 is present with Method CreateFromData2 for system type ERP_6.0.
Does it make difference in terms of Method?
Please suggest.
Regards,
Abhishek
↧
Re: Change task description
Hi, please check SAP Note.
1265414 - add more information to workflow notifications
especially attached PDF.
Regards
Konstantin
↧
↧
Re: PI and RFC connection not working at the same time
Hi,
I'm not sure what does CreateFromData2 mean.
For transfer SC->PO the method CreateFromData1 is used.
Regards
Konstantin
↧
Re: PO's Tracking tab does not have entry of invoice
I was able to se Invoice through T code bbp_pd but there are no entries under header and item links
↧
Re: SC forwarding issue
Hi Ravi,
There is no dump from the user in GUI. The issue is from ITS
After further analysis,
1, SC is forwarded to another user for approval
2. SWIA reflects the forward user details for the relevant workitem
3. SOST message is also triggered for the forwarding apporver
4. Forwarded user log in to ITS, checks the details and approves the SC (Header level as per process)
5. Here comes the issue, next apporver gets a dump in ITS since he can not verify the details and appropve, the abnormality observed was status of the SC was still in "To be Approved by" for the forwarded user.
How do I change the status as approved at user level and I think issue will get fixed.
I hope I was clear in forwarding the analysis.
Thanks,
Bhavesh
↧