Hi,
Yes, your understanding is correct. If you search delivery address in SC, it will display all the delivery addresses assigned to all companies.
Please read wiki https://wiki.scn.sap.com/wiki/x/Wo05DQ
BR,
Ivy
↧
Re: SAP SRM 7.0 delivery address addition in PPOMA_BBP error
↧
Getting default tax code from SUS invoice to ECC MM invoice
Hello All:
We are using MM-SUS scenario (with SRM 7). In invoice replicated from SUS I am getting the default tax code from SUS system and not from ECC (PO). I am looking for option when invoice gets transferred from SUS to MM it should use tax code from ECC.
In MM: I have done customizing for EDI tax code i.e. OBCA/OBCD/OMRY is completed
In SUS: customizing SRM server -> cross application basic settings -> tax calculation is completed.
1. Determine system for tax calculation --> R/3 tax calculation occurs in backend
2. Enter tax code --> I0 = 0 % default input tax and I1 = 8 % AP sales tax
3. Assign enterprise buyer tax code to FI system --> We have defined same tax codes in SUS and MM
Please suggest solution for this issue i.e. while replicating ECC invoice from SUS, how system can pick tax code and tax amount from ECC only.
Regards
Pankaj B.
↧
↧
Re: Create SRM reports to identify issues with awaiting approval PO's
Hi Abhishek
There is no direct report .
I will post a couple of options you can choose and then to get exactly you want you can change by creating a custom report copying logic from here .
1, Create a BI report from standard extractor
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_05/helpdata/en/f3/165816c1ef324b98f6d4170966cd0d/frameset.htm
2. Use Report BBP_BW_SC2 and choose Follow on doc status as I1113 and get the SC and PO details
3. FM BBP_BW_SC_SELECT_1 this has additional fields comapred the report above
4. Check the application monitor transaction on portal and it should show you all these details .
Do let me know if it helps
Regards
Vinita
↧
SRM 7.0 version Punch-out catalog interface issue
We have Punch-out catalogs procurement for our Business, when we configure all required configs in SRM and try via SRM NWBC (Using Google Chrome browser) we could able to get on to Punch-out vendor website, can be able select required products but when we click on check-out option, selected products are not getting routed back to our SRM NWBC portal. Whereas it works well in IE browser. Any solution please advise ASAP.
BR
Muni.
↧
Add details in Advanced search POWL
Hi All
Please help me to add an extra column in result table and in the search criteria and where to update the logic to enable this new search criteria to be used?
As you see below I am able to add Vendor in search criteria and Result this is by changing the standard webdynpro component
Component: /SAPSRM/WDC_UI_DS_SO_SC
View: V_SC_SYSTEM_DTLS
Now we are NOT able to identify where to add the logic to update the value in the vendor column as seen above.
I tried with the /SAPSRM/BD_CLL_POWL_FEEDER in that
/SAPSRM/BD_POWL_CHNG_SEL_RSLT
But even though it gets triggered it does not show up the data in the CT_RESULT parameter it shows a blank list .
Please advise on how this can be achieved ?
Regards
Vinita
↧
↧
Date Subtraction/Addition based on Factory Calendar in SRM
Hi experts,
I am new to ABAP.
My requirement is :
I need to calculate sy-datum - somedays = date based on factory calendar.
But there is a function module BKK_ADD_WORKINGDAY but it is in ECC and it is not RFC enabled.
Is there any alternate method or logic to this to compute this in SRM?
Regards,
Sushanth
↧
Re: Error has occurred in pricing - message BBP_PD 353 - SRM PO
Hi all,
We executed the programs suggested by Vinita and all the IPC setting are correctly maintained.
Report RSVMCRT_HEALTH_CHECK
BBP_CND_CUSTOMIZING_CHECK
Also resetting the VMC, as suggested, using SM52 did not worked.
The UOM it's correct.
After all of this, I will debug to try to find the root cause for this particular PO in SRM.
Thank you for your help.
Any news about this case, I will update the post.
Regards,
Carlos Morgado.
↧
Re: SLC:how to activate supplier promote automatic approved workflow?
HI，Senthil
How to enhance ? Which BADI? Could you tell me ?
Thanks very much.
Jesse
↧
Link tables for SRM (search by Product)
Hi Folks,
Can anyone please help me out in finding tables to join links in search help for the following.
The requirement is to add Plant, MRP type and contract number in the output. I am not able to find the tables to link here.
Can anyone pls help on this.
Thanks,
Priya.
↧
↧
Re: Date Subtraction/Addition based on Factory Calendar in SRM
Hi Sushanth
This is a known issue in the SRM system you have to use the factory calendar in ECC and use this in BADI in SRM BBP_DOC_CHECK_BADI
Refer note 1467113 - Factory Calendar is not available in SRM
and in this note there is a sample code also on how you can use this in SRM system
Let me know if this helps
Regards
Vinita
↧
Re: Link tables for SRM (search by Product)
Hi Padma
Plant : CRMD_PARTNER for Partner_FCT field as 00000075
Contract : Its a line item information found in BBP_PDIGP Table by passing item GUID
and you can get the value in field CTR_HDR_NUMBER
MRP type : I am not sure on this . Where do you see this information on Portal ?
Try searching in that section in Tcode BBP_PD it could be a custom field at your client;s side
Let me know if this helps
Regards
Vinita
↧
Re: SRM 7.0 version Punch-out catalog interface issue
Hi Muni
Generally it could be something related to version support . However try to refer to this thread
or you can mark Laurent in this post to be able to get her response
Btw Do you get some error is there a screenshot you can post ?
Like service not reachable etc ..
Punch-out catalog does not open in SRM 7.13
Regards
Vinita
↧
Re: Link tables for SRM (search by Product)
Hi Vinita,
Thanks alot.. 
↧
↧
Re: Alert configuration for SRM
hello
Thank you Laszlo Haladin for your response .
Can i define an alert for SRM using the Tcode ALRTCATDEF ? if is so can you tell me how???
Reards
OUISSAM
↧
Service PR in ECC can not be created as SRM Local PO
Hi, friends
I set SRM as ECS (extended classic scenario), I create a PR with service line and transfer to SRM , in performing sourcing screen, I create PO reference this service PR, but the system creates a Backend PO not local PO. PO creation of no service PR is normal with SRM local PO.
Please tell my why, I think that it must have a Note provided to correct, Am I right?
ECC: SAPKH61711, SRM: SAPK-71311
Thanks !
Jesse.
↧
Re: Service PR in ECC can not be created as SRM Local PO
Hi Jesse
Check the below points and ensure everything is maintained according to settings defined below:
1. In SPRO :"
SAP Implementation Guide
> SAP Supplier Relationship Management
> SRM Server
> Cross-Application Basic Settings
> Activate Extended Classic Scenario
2. Check if any code in bADI :
BBP_EXTLOCALPO_BADI
BBP_ECS_PO_OUT_BADI
3. Check number ranges :
Refer link
Extended classic scenario - no backend PO created
PO Customizing - Supplier Relationship Management - SCN Wiki
a) at SRM side:
- To assign the transaction type to the extended classic scenario you have to maintain the transaction type name (= the R/3 PO document type) to the attribute DP_PROC_TY (in contradiction to BSA in classic scenario) in PPOMA_BBP of the responsible Purchazing group.
- Create a number range for a local PO.
- Assign the local PO number range as a internal numer range to the transaction type.
b) at R/3 side:
- Enter the Number Range (corresponding to the SRM number range PO) and flag it as an external number range (trx. OMH6 Number Range for Purchasing Documents)
- Maintain the document type corresponding to the SRM transaction type and assign the R/3 number range for POs as "NoRge Ext" (field V_T161-NUMKE) (trx. Document type within Purchase Order Customizing)
- Make sure that the SRM and R/3 number ranges match are exactly the same.
4. Do debugging using below link :
https://wiki.scn.sap.com/wiki/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=340264144
If nothing works then you might want to raise to SAP .
but it should work if everything is done correctly as in the links mentioned .
Regards
Vinita
↧
Re: Service PR in ECC can not be created as SRM Local PO
Hi Jesse,
Are you replicating the service PR to SRM via ESOA?
If so, then I have to say that this is how standard system works.
Let me explain firstly as below.
1. If you replicate PR with RFC transfer (report BBP_EXTREQ_TRANSFER):
When user creates PR with service and transfers using RFC, we create SC with outline type as HIER. Since we do not support nested hierarchy in RFC transfer, we use one outline (HIER) and one or more service lines under it. While creating SC, we consider each service line and check if it is EP or classic. But we ignore the Outline as it is only dummy from SRM point of view. So in all follow-on cases, i.e. SOCO, finding SOS, or creating follow-on documents, we ignore outline and consider only the functional items. Even in SOCO, since we look for functional items, we get SUBTYPE as EP and logical system as SRM. In this case, we could have extended classic PO.
2. If you replicate service PR with ESOA:
Not handling service hierarchy was SRM limitation when we consider integrated scenario, while ERP was handling it with no issues. So in SRM 7.0, we introduced SOA for tranfering PR from ERP. While doing this design, we also considered having nested hierarchy from PR in SC. So we introduced HIER_SE template and grouping level M.
Owing to the complexity and bring in the behavior like ERP, we also introduced handling follow-on activities at top outline level (like SOS, SOCO, creating follow-on document). So since outline is coming from ERP and we don't set secnario (classic or extended classic), from SOCO it allows only to create classic PO. Since SRM PO doesn't support hierarchy and since grouping level M can have nested hierarchy, SRM is designed to have only classic PO for this scenario. If we use HIER_SRM in case of ESOA, we can still do the extended classic PO, but we might loose out the hierarchy structure from ERP.
Considering the reasons above, if you want extended classic PO, I'm afraid you have to consider to handle this in DOC change BADI (setting BE_LOG_SYSTEM and SUBTYPE at outline level).
I hope this could provide you with some understanding of the design.
Regards,
Wendy
↧
↧
Shopping Cart not available in Confirmation Creation process.
Dear gurus,
I'm having a doubt with the Confirmation Creation process.
Our user has changed one Shopping Cart from USER A to USER B. Now the Shopping Cart is not available for USER B.
We checked the roles of USER B. The requester roles are assigned & CC is also available.The user is also assigned to the correct Org. Structure, but still, user can
not search the Shipping Cart while creating confirmation,.
Any clue of which roles should be granted?. Any clue of what might be happening?.
Kind Regards.
Raúl
↧
SRM 7.0 version NWBC no product category found in search
Hi,
Our business went for HANA migration, so they copied all existed Production SRM systems and named as HANA SRM Quality system. We have COMM_HEIRARCHY, COMM_CATEGORYT and COMM_CATEGORY data in our HANA SRM QA system. And also have Product Category under PPOMA_BBP extended attributes. But still while creating shopping cart in NWBC portal, search is not displaying product category. Any clue you guys can suggest? Attached the screen shot of NWBC portal error.
BR
Muni.
↧
Service purchase order is different in SRM and ECC
Hi Team,
Kindly clarify my doubt:
SRM version : SRM 7.0 EHP2
Technical scnario : Extend classic Scnario.
Service purchase order got created from SOCO from service SC in SRM. Suppose it has 5 items. Purchase order got replicated to ECC successfully.
But 1 , 2,3 & 5 got replciated to ECC successfully. But 4th line item got replciated to ECC differently. 4th line item has sub services in ECC so price of the 4th line item is different what it got created in SRM.
In SRM portal it is not showing subitems for that line item.
How i will check and confirm user must have selected subitems for this line item in SRM ?
even I am also not understading 5 items simply got converted to purchase order by purchaser from SOCO. without purchaser intension how come subitems got created automatically in ECC.
Is there any techncial point needs to check on this? where to check ? kindly advise me on this.
Thanks,
Viswanath.
↧