Hi
Please could you have a look at the issue and let me know what else i can try?
Please can you advise?
Regards
Vinita
↧
Re: Add details in Advanced search POWL
↧
Re: SRM 7.0 version NWBC no product category found in search
Hi Muni
So did you do a whole replication again ?
in that case did you maintain all middleware settings correctly
do you see product category in backend transactions like COMM
Check in PPOSA_BBP for any other user if faced with similar issue
Can you try to see if this applies ?
Note 1865529:Product category/Product ID is not displayed to end user when creating a shopping cart
Regards
Vinita
↧
↧
Re: Shopping Cart not available in Confirmation Creation process.
Hi Raúl,
What is the SRM Version?
Did you change the document owner with process mentioned in link below...
https://wiki.scn.sap.com/wiki/display/SRM/New+Functionality+in+SRM713+--+Inconsistent+BP+Handling
To verify if the owner of SC is really the user searching for it proceed as follows..
1. In Org structure check the Business Partner number of the Central person associated with the user's position.
2. In BBP_PD check Business Partner number for Partner function '00000016' i.e. requester.
Both should be same for the user to be able to search the shopping cart.
Thanks,
Anubhav
↧
Re: How to find the SRM PO timestamp
Hi Ricardo,
Yes we got the same result which was given by wendy
↧
Re: Add details in Advanced search POWL
Hi Vinita,
You can identify the POWL type with the process given in this link
http://scn.sap.com/docs/DOC-51966
The Search structure for POWL is /SAPSRM/S_SEARCHFIELDS and Vendor is standard field already available in the structure.
You can add this field in the search criterion by adding it in the DB criterion for the POWL type in transaction /SAPSRM/POWL_CUST
Check this link for more details under section 'Add the field in DB Criteria'
http://scn.sap.com/docs/DOC-25692
For adding the field in Result table again transaction /SAPSRM/POWL_CUST and add the field in 'Field Catalog' of feeder
Vendor field is not available in the standard result structure BBP_PDS_PDITEMLIST so you need to add a Z(for e.g. ZZVENDOR) field in the structure and than add it in field catalog
Click 'New Entries' and add an entry for ZZVENDOR' using the search help by specifying position where you want to display it in result table.
To take this field into account when searching for shopping carts enhance method /SAPSRM/IF_PDO_SO_SEARCH_SC_2~EXECUTE_SEARCH of class /SAPSRM/CL_PDO_SO_SEARCH_SC_2 - this is the place where actual search for SC is executed and results are returned.
In this method you need to add logic to pass vendor to search criterion to 'BBP_PD_SC_GETLIST' and also map the resultant Vendor field to your ZZVENDOR field.
Hope this will give you some pointer towards a working solution 
Thanks,
Anubhav
↧
↧
Transcation Type not found
We are on SRM 7.0 and are trying to convert a SC into RFQ and get error Transaction type not found within Sourcing cockpit. Can you please let us know what is the configuration required for creation of the BID.
We have added a check box to table /SAPSRM/V_SOCO and are able view to BID option within sourcing cockpit, so that SC can be converted into RFQ.
We have also maintained the hierarchy attribute BID within Transaction type however we still see the error. can any one point out the configuration required to create an RFQ.
Thank you
↧
Re: SRM 7.0 version NWBC no product category found in search
Hi Muni,
Please check the following settings:
1. SPRO-->SAP Implementation Guide-->SAP Supplier Relationship Management-->SRM Server-->Technical Basic Settings-->Define Backend System for Product Category - Source and target system should be your backend ECC system
2. Table COMM_CATEGORY field LOGSYS is your back end ECC System
3. In Org Structure for the user's position, under extended attributes-->Product Categories user has product categories or * maintained with correct Src. System i.e. again your back end ECC system and Deactivated is NOT checked.
If all looks good, you can try debugging function module COM_PRODUCT_CATEGORY_GETLIST to check why and where the product categories are wiped out.
Thanks,
Anubhav
↧
Service lines not allowed on Invoicing Plans after upgrade
We just upgraded to ECC ehp7 and SRM 7.03 on Netweaver 7.4
We are using Invoicing plans with Framework PO's and just started receiving the error message "Combination of GR/IR control not allowed in FM for external services" in MRIS when we are trying to post the invoices. We were able to use service lines for invoicing plans prior to the upgrade. Invoicing plans still work fine for material lines. Does anyone know how to by-pass this error?
↧
Re: Bank Data
Hello Chris,
We are trying to replicate vendor bank details from ECC to SRM and I need your inputs to re activate object settings.
I have gone through the table 'SMOFAPPL' and BBP object is activated right now. So, do I need to activate CRM as well. If yes, will it be continue to be activated.
The reason being, when I configure the DNL_CUST_BNKA customizing object, system picking up the CRM user rather SRM.
So, please share your thoughts which will be highly appreciated.
Thanks
Ram
↧
↧
Re: Delivery schedule line sort order in SUS POs
And, it also seems like my test users in Dev don't have the same problem. So it's something in production. Roles?
↧
Re: How to find the SRM PO timestamp
Hi,
Do you mean you ran FM BBP_PD_PO_TRANSFER_EXEC manually to re-transfer the failed PO?
Regards,
Wendy
↧
Re: Service PR in ECC can not be created as SRM Local PO
Hi, Wendy
I created a service PR , and in SRM changed 'BE_LOG_SYSTEM' as SRM logistic system, changed 'SUBTYPE' as 'EP'.
But I started carry sourcing cockpit to create a PO, the system dump. I checked the error by ST22.
the error as bellow:
============================
IF ev_object_id IS INITIAL.
* get next free number
CALL FUNCTION 'NUMBER_GET_NEXT'
EXPORTING
nr_range_nr = lv_nr_range
object = 'REQREQ'
IMPORTING
number = ev_object_id
EXCEPTIONS
interval_not_found = 1
number_range_not_intern = 2
object_not_found = 3.
* if not possible to determine doc number
IF sy-subrc <> 0.
* raise exception
ls_message-msgty = 'E'.
ls_message-msgid = 'BBP_PU'.
ls_message-msgno = 208.
ls_message-msgv1 = lv_nr_range.
APPEND ls_message TO lt_message.
CREATE OBJECT lx_sc_transfer
EXPORTING
bbp_messages = lt_message.
RAISE EXCEPTION lx_sc_transfer.
ENDIF.
=====================
So , the system still try to create Backend PO. How to stop it ?
thanks
↧
SRM ALERTS
Hello experts ,
I am looking to configure email alerts for SRM for multiple scenarios such as RFx published and Response statut.
i've searched a lot about this topic but i can't seem to find the solution..
Can someone plz help me 
↧
↧
Re: How to find the SRM PO timestamp
Hi Sanjay,
You can check the time stamps of status in table CRM_JCDS.
Kindly give the document header guid or item guid in Object GUID on Selection Screen.
Regards,
Arpit
↧
Q: Early Watch Alert -
Good afternoon
Since february 2016 I've been employed as a very junior sap support person,I have 5-6 years experience as a database administrator (SQL Server) and had for february little to no experience with SAP (I did as dba sometimes perform maintenance tasks on SAP databases)
Now along my tasks is a monthly analysis of the EWA reports of our clients.
FOr 1 client I'm having an issue which I can't make heads or tails from and where I rather not jump into anything rash.
This client has multiple systems/instances/enviroments to check.
But for 1 such system I see the error "Data for session is overdue/not arrived"
Last month we had the same issue but resolved that, now what was done to resolve last time,seem to no longer work.
The connection test for the abap connection SM_SMPCLNT100_BACK is succesfull.
As far as I can tell the settings are the same in the system as in 1 that worked.
In sdccn the tasks for EWA are succefull and look ok to me.
Antone that can give me some pointers of what steps I can/have to take in order to find out the cause and how to resolve it.
↧
Re: Create SRM reports to identify issues with awaiting approval PO's
Hi Abhishek,
In order to achieve the requirement of first point, i had created a simple SQVI Query. Kindly get the details below.
Tables to be Joined:
CRMD_ORDERADM_H - Document header Table
/SAPSRM/D_WF_000 - Table for persistent class /SAPSRM/CL_WF_PROCESS
SWWWIHEAD - Header Table for All Work Item Types
Selection Screen Fields:
- Transaction Number - CRMD_ORDERADM_H-OBJECT_ID
- Business Trans. Cat. - CRMD_ORDERADM_H-OBJECT_TYPE
- Posting Date for a Business Transaction - CRMD_ORDERADM_H-POSTING_DATE
- Work item text - SWWWIHEAD-WI_TEXT
- Processing Status of a Work Item - SWWWIHEAD-WI_STAT
Output:
- Transaction Number
- +As per your requirement
Join Conditions:
- Join the GUID of CRMD_ORDERADM_H to DOCUMENT_GUID of /SAPSRM/D_WF_000.
- Join the WORKFLOW_INST_ID of /SAPSRM/D_WF_000 to TOP_WI_ID of SWWWIHEAD.
Run the query for below selection values:
- Business Trans. Cat = BUS2201
- Posting Date for a Business Transaction = As per your requirement
- Work item text = Handle Process Finish
- Processing Status of a Work Item = ERROR
With above selection values, you will get the below documents.
Document is approved by last approve but still the document stuck in Awaiting Approval Status due to some workflow error.
Hope this help.
Regards,
Arpit
↧
Re: SRM ALERTS
↧
↧
Re: SRM ALERTS
Hello Laurent
Thank you for replying .
Yes i did checked that wiki before but unfortunately i didn't get much use of it . Basically i've tried to create alerts for srm using the Tcode ALRTCATDEF but when triggering the alert i don't get the container elements filled while receiving the alert email mostly because we do not have XI/PI system i think?
Also i tried another alternative mentioned in the wiki that you have shared : i defined an event ( RFx published) but i didn't know how to define an email recipient for this event...
Regards
Ouissam
↧
Payment terms visibility in RFx
Hi all. I am in SRM 7.02. I want field "payment terms" in RFx to be visible.
Could you help me ?
↧
Re: Payment terms visibility in RFx
Hi, find this example for SC that might help on RFx.
Also after add the field keep in mind to pass it to follow on documents.
Hope this help!
↧
